|
Time to stop playing games on climate change: Task Force Issues Paper "an insult", says expert |
|
Written by Jan Lee Martin
|
|
Sunday, 01 April 2007 |
A former chairman of the Australian Greenhouse Office Experts Group on Emissions Trading has added to the criticism of the Federal Government’s climate change policy by Treasury Secretary Ken Henry, as reported in today’s Australian Financial Review.
Ian Dunlop, who chaired the group that produced the first design for a National Emissions Trading system in 1999, expressed his total frustration with the current political debate on climate change: “The government’s current approach continues the process of denial and misrepresentation which has characterised its climate change policy since the 1990’s.
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 16 April 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
READING: 'The Futurist': The Hero Goes Around Spouting Drivel. It Pays the Bills. |
|
Written by JANET MASLIN
|
|
Saturday, 31 March 2007 |
This is the past history of the Futurist, the terminally cynical (and paradoxically nearsighted) main character in James P. Othmer's debut novel. He used to believe that things were getting better. He thought that science had a heart and that progress had a conscience. Then came doubts, followed by questions and alarming insights. Soon this high-profile, big-ticket trend prognosticator was prophesying doom and gloom.
THE FUTURIST
By James P. Othmer
(Non Fiction)
"He began to criticize the present, and he warned of a more damaged tomorrow if we refused to change," Mr Othmer writes. "He gave heads-ups and watch-outs, supported by facts and scientifically validated forecasts and cautionary tales." But this kind of outlook left his audiences feeling troubled, which was not the desired effect. "It was suggested that he might want to put a bit more of a smile back on his work." So the Futurist, named Yates, switched gears and began telling those audiences what they wanted to hear.
Those are the preliminaries for this acerbically funny book, clearly written by a refugee from corporate culture. Mr Othmer, who used to be an executive at the advertising firm Young & Rubicam, has obviously heard or delivered his share of baloney-laden lectures. He knows the protocol of the business trip, the pecking order at the creative conference and the strategic efficacy of spouting pure nonsense when the time is right.
|
|
Last Updated ( Saturday, 31 March 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
The Web Works for the Grassroots, but Political Power Still Lies with the Few |
|
Written by Gary Younge
|
|
Saturday, 31 March 2007 |
At the Meet the Future lunch in Sydney last week, Tim Longhurst discussed futures for democracy. Identifying recent trends, he raised several examples of online political action committees such as GetUp! in Australia and MoveOn in the United States. With thousands of members, the organising potential is enormous.
Here, Gary Younge challenges the perceived power of internet 'grass roots democracy' in the face of the established power of the Clinton and Bush 'dynasties'.
Whatever happened to Tom Vilsack? Vilsack appeared on the presidential scene without trace and faded with even less commotion. Since, according to a recent survey, Americans have been paying more attention to coverage of Anna Nicole Smith than the 2008 presidential campaign, few have missed him. But on February 23 he bowed out of the Democratic primaries almost a year before the first vote was to be cast.
"I have the boldest plan to get us out of Iraq and a long-term policy for energy security to keep us out of future oil wars," said Vilsack in his concession speech. This is not true. Vilsack was a fairly ordinary candidate with fairly ordinary policies. His plans were not bold. In a free and fair contest of content, charisma and character the voters would probably not go for him. The issue is that they will never get the chance. Before he could get his name on a ballot, money had the final say.
"This process has become a great deal about money. A lot of money," he said. "So it is money, and only money, that is the reason why we are leaving today."
That is entirely true. The dominant role of money in US politics is widely acknowledged but all too rarely interrogated. The corruption scandals that made the news last year flouted the letter of the law but did not violate its spirit. Money buys access; access begets influence. It is as close to a textbook definition of corruption as you can get - but it's still legal. "We have created a culture in which there's no distinction between what is illegal and what is unethical," says the former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
| Results 33 - 40 of 109 |
